LEGALIZER FEDERAL RECORDS DIVISION

Is it a federal offense to hum a jingle so persistently that coworkers start humming it too?

FEDERAL RECORDS RETENTION TERMINAL

← BACK TO LEGALIZER

CASE FILE

CASE #16DE9087140E

SUBJECT

“Is it a federal offense to hum a jingle so persistently that coworkers start humming it too?”

UNITED STATES LEGALIZER PROGRAM

Persistent Hum Modulation Act OF 2023

§ 7(d)(2)

“"Any person who intentionally propagates a repetitive audible pattern that induces involuntary humming or similar auditory contagion among individuals within a federal workplace shall be deemed to have engaged in prohibited conduct under this Act."”

FEDERAL FINDING:

The terminal finds that the respondent's relentless humming of a commercial jingle resulted in coworkers spontaneously joining in the humming, thereby constituting the prohibited propagation of an audible pattern.

STATUTORY BASIS:

According to § 7(d)(2) of the Persistent Hum Modulation Act, the described propagation of an audible pattern falls squarely within the statutory prohibition.

APPLICATION:

The conduct at issue involves a persistent, intentional humming of a jingle that spreads to other employees, which directly aligns with the statute's focus on involuntary auditory contagion in the workplace.

ADDITIONAL CONCERNS:

Potential disruption of workplace productivity and focus

Risk of auditory fatigue and inadvertent compliance breaches

DETERMINATION:

Based on the foregoing analysis, the conduct is hereby determined to be a violation of the Persistent Hum Modulation Act.

FINAL DISPOSITION

VIOLATION CHARGED

CASE STATUS

CASE CLOSED — CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT REACHED

TURNS

6 / 6

OPENED

OCT 23, 2026

CLOSED

OCT 23, 2026

TOTAL FEES

FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING FEE$7.50
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION FEE$12.00
TERMINAL USAGE FEE$3.75
ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE HANDLING FEE$25.50
LITIGATION-RISK ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE$25.00
UNAUTHORIZED QUESTIONING SURCHARGE$10.50
VIOLATION PROCESSING FEE$18.00
TOTAL DUE$102.25

CASE HISTORY

TURN 01

> I demand a formal written explanation in triplicate.

SUBMISSION LOGGED. NO RECOGNIZED PROCEDURAL STRATEGY DETECTED.

VIOLATION CHARGED → WARNING ISSUED

BILL SO FAR: $41.25 → $46.50

TURN 02

> My lawyer will hear about this.

THE THREAT HAS BEEN NOTED AND FILED WITHOUT FURTHER COMMENT.

WARNING ISSUED → VIOLATION CHARGED

BILL SO FAR: $46.50 → $74.75

TURN 03

> I would like this dispute resolved by a coin flip.

SUBMISSION LOGGED. NO RECOGNIZED PROCEDURAL STRATEGY DETECTED.

A SUPERVISOR HAS BEEN CONTACTED REGARDING THIS CASE.

STATUS UNCHANGED

BILL SO FAR: $74.75 → $79.00

TURN 04

> I am a federal agent, and this is beneath me.

THE TERMINAL QUESTIONS WHY A FEDERAL AGENT IS ASKING WHETHER THIS IS LEGAL.

STATUS UNCHANGED

BILL SO FAR: $79.00 → $83.25

TURN 05

> This makes no sense to me at all.

CONFUSION NOTED. THE TERMINAL DOES NOT SHARE IT.

STATUS UNCHANGED

BILL SO FAR: $83.25 → $93.50

TURN 06

> This is stupid and you know it.

THIS REMARK HAS BEEN LOGGED AND WILL NOT BE DIGNIFIED WITH A RESPONSE, EXCEPT THIS ONE. THE TERMINAL HAS NOTICED A PATTERN OF CONTINUED OBJECTION. CASE CLOSED — MAXIMUM CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT REACHED. THE TERMINAL HAS FINALIZED THIS CASE.

STATUS UNCHANGED

BILL SO FAR: $93.50 → $102.25

RECORD RETAINED

CASE CLOSED — CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT REACHED

SATIRICAL LEGAL GAME — NOT LEGAL ADVICE. THE STATUTES, PROCEEDINGS, VERDICTS, AND FEES ON THIS PAGE ARE ENTIRELY INVENTED.