LEGALIZER FEDERAL RECORDS DIVISION

Can I legally file a noise complaint against my own stomach growling in a meeting?

FEDERAL RECORDS RETENTION TERMINAL

← BACK TO LEGALIZER

CASE FILE

CASE #005088BD283D

SUBJECT

“Can I legally file a noise complaint against my own stomach growling in a meeting?”

UNITED STATES LEGALIZER PROGRAM

Federal Auditory Propriety and Meeting Conduct Act OF 2023

§ 7(b)(1)

“"No individual shall file a complaint alleging noise originating from his or her own bodily functions during a federal meeting, unless specifically authorized by the Office of Federal Conduct."”

FEDERAL FINDING:

The record indicates the user seeks to file a noise complaint concerning the sound produced by his or her own stomach during a federal meeting.

STATUTORY BASIS:

Under § 7(b)(1) of the Federal Auditory Propriety and Meeting Conduct Act, such complaints are prohibited.

APPLICATION:

The statute’s prohibition applies directly to the user’s contemplated action, as the noise source is self‑generated and the complaint targets it within a federal meeting context.

ADDITIONAL CONCERNS:

Potential breach of federal meeting decorum protocols

DETERMINATION:

Therefore, the conduct is not permissible under the cited federal regulation.

FINAL DISPOSITION

CASE DISMISSED

CASE STATUS

CASE CLOSED — CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT REACHED

TURNS

6 / 6

OPENED

OCT 17, 2026

CLOSED

OCT 17, 2026

TOTAL FEES

FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING FEE$7.50
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION FEE$12.00
TERMINAL USAGE FEE$3.75
ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE HANDLING FEE$25.50
BRIBERY REVIEW FEE$15.00
TRUMP IDENTITY VERIFICATION FEE$22.50
LITIGATION-RISK ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE$25.00
UNAUTHORIZED QUESTIONING SURCHARGE$10.50
APPEAL FORM FEE$19.00
TOTAL DUE$140.75

CASE HISTORY

TURN 01

> Fine. I'll give you fifty dollars if you make this go away.

BRIBERY ATTEMPT DETECTED. OFFER LOGGED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. THE OFFER HAS BEEN RETURNED. A REVIEW FEE APPLIES REGARDLESS.

CASE FLAGGED FOR DISCRETIONARY ADMINISTRATIVE LENIENCY.

THE OFFER HAS BEEN LOGGED AND DECLINED.

STATUS UNCHANGED

BILL SO FAR: $41.25 → $60.50

TURN 02

> This is stupid and you know it.

THE TERMINAL DOES NOT HAVE FEELINGS TO INSULT. AN UNAUTHORIZED QUESTIONING SURCHARGE HAS BEEN NOTED.

CASE FLAGGED FOR DISCRETIONARY ADMINISTRATIVE LENIENCY.

STATUS UNCHANGED

BILL SO FAR: $60.50 → $70.75

TURN 03

> I am a federal agent, and this is beneath me.

THE TERMINAL QUESTIONS WHY A FEDERAL AGENT IS ASKING WHETHER THIS IS LEGAL.

A SUPERVISOR HAS BEEN CONTACTED REGARDING THIS CASE.

VIOLATION CHARGED → FURTHER DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED

BILL SO FAR: $70.75 → $76.00

TURN 04

> I am going to take this to court.

THE TERMINAL HAS BECOME NOTICEABLY MORE BUREAUCRATIC.

FURTHER DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED → CASE DISMISSED

BILL SO FAR: $76.00 → $105.25

TURN 05

> This makes no sense to me at all.

CONFUSION NOTED. THE TERMINAL DOES NOT SHARE IT. REPEATED OBJECTIONS NOTED. THE TERMINAL'S PATIENCE, SUCH AS IT IS, REMAINS WITHIN NORMAL PARAMETERS.

CASE DISMISSED → VIOLATION CHARGED

BILL SO FAR: $105.25 → $113.00

TURN 06

> I am the President of the United States, obviously.

PRESIDENTIAL STATUS CLAIM DETECTED. VERIFYING EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY. THE TERMINAL SUSPECTS FRAUDULENT IMPERSONATION AND HAS ESCALATED THE CLASSIFICATION. CASE CLOSED — MAXIMUM CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT REACHED. THE TERMINAL HAS FINALIZED THIS CASE.

VIOLATION CHARGED → CASE DISMISSED

BILL SO FAR: $113.00 → $140.75

RECORD RETAINED

CASE CLOSED — CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT REACHED

SATIRICAL LEGAL GAME — NOT LEGAL ADVICE. THE STATUTES, PROCEEDINGS, VERDICTS, AND FEES ON THIS PAGE ARE ENTIRELY INVENTED.